F. Bermejo
To Win
R. Haviland
To Win
Ryan Haviland vs Michael Shabaz Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L L W L L L
Form
W L L W L W W L W LHead-To-Head: Haviland 1 - 0 Shabaz
They have played 2 sets in total, with Haviland winning 2 and Shabaz winning 0. The last match between Haviland and Shabaz was at the USA F16, 11-05-2015, First, Clay with Ryan Haviland getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ryan Haviland | 1 |
| Michael Shabaz | 0 |
USA F16(11-05-2015)
6
3
6
4
Upcoming Match
- / Q1 round
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sevastova VS Pavlyuchenkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fett VS Ruzic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Ryan Haviland Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Ryan Haviland
54%
(
29 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
59%
(
17 of
29)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
23 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 4-6 6-4 10-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 3-6 7-5 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Bryce Nakashima
Player
Ryan Haviland
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
10
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
31 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-3 5-7 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
view more
Michael Shabaz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 4-6 10-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Ryan Dickerson
Player
Michael Shabaz
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-4 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Hudson Rivera
Player
Michael Shabaz
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
40 of
66)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gage Brymer
Player
Michael Shabaz
69%
(
78 of
113)
1st Serve %
66%
(
82 of
125)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
52 of
82)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
36%
(
41 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
54 of
125)
126
Total Points Won
112
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55% (126/103) | Win/Loss | 52% (160/146) |
| 55% (292/238) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (379/335) |
| 52% (2643/2402) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (3475/3297) |
| 57% (85/63) | Hard Win/Loss | 53% (115/101) |
| 58% (33/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 52% (30/28) |
| 28% (5/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48% (14/15) |
| 50% (3/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) |
| 0.15 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 368 | Aces Total | 263 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.06 |
| 402 | Total Double Faults | 188 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 380.41 | Average Opponent Rank | 517.95 |
| 56% (2961/5335) | 1st Serve % | 60% (2903/4852) |
| 71% (2099/2961) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1928/2903) |
| 46% (1083/2374) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (934/1949) |
| 41% (216/528) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 36% (154/433) |
| 41% (2151/5274) | Return Points Win % | 37% (1779/4846) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 50% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (6/10) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (4/8) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (42/43) | Challenger W/L | 43% (17/23) |
| 61% (78/50) | Futures W/L | 55% (138/114) |
| 56% (126/227) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (159/303) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 43% (28/65) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (52/97) |
| 46% (33/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (44/103) |
| 80% (139/111) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 79% (180/142) |
| 20% (139/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (180/37) |
| 17% (90/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (126/18) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
